Search engine optimisation (SEO) is a continual battle against your competition. You may be number one today, but tomorrow your competition may implement a new strategy and push you down the ladder. This constant race to the top is one of the least understood factors of SEO. Many clients believe that once they have achieved a strong search engine ranking, they can stop worrying and turn their attentions elsewhere. The reality is that SEO is a race with no finish line. You may be in the lead, but if you stop running, or even slow down, you can quickly be overtaken and left choking on dust.
Since the arrival of search engines, clever webmasters have devised more and more innovative ways of helping their websites appear better within them. Just as an athlete trains muscles and sharpens their spikes before the big race, SEO practitioners hone the code and content of websites to create the most ideal circumstances to get out in front.
But, as in professional athletics, there are always those who find more controversial ways of improving their chances. In response, new rules are created, new guidelines laid down, new penalties implemented. Search engines have continually refined and updated their algorithms and released Webmaster Guidelines to reduce the risk of what they see as unfair behaviour affecting their results. The goal of search engines is to provide the best results for the end-user, the person conducting the search. Therefore, every guideline and penalty is constructed with this person in mind, not the webmaster.
Not everyone agrees with this focus. Some webmasters feel Google should be paying more attention to their personal goals of generating traffic for their online businesses and are prepared to flout the guidelines to redress this perceived imbalance. Those webmasters and SEO practitioners that choose to operate outside of the established guidelines have become known as ‘black-hats’, with those happy to play by Google’s rules characterised as ‘white-hats’.
Winning at Any Cost
As an example, one common black-hat SEO technique is to use ‘cloaking’. Cloaking involves using various techniques to present a different web page to the user than to the search engines. The search engine algorithm assesses and ranks one page, but when the user clicks on the link in the search engine results, they receive different content. Sometimes these differences are minor – an alternative set of links or changes to the content – but sometimes this can mean a completely different page.
When this technique was identified by the search engines, they quickly adjusted their guidelines and algorithms in an attempt to reduce its influence. But the algorithm is not perfect, and many black-hat techniques can only be identified by human monitoring and detailed manual review.
One of the most public examples of cloaking being exposed was the incident with BMW back in 2006. BMW had created special ‘doorway pages’, designed to rank very highly in Google for certain profitable keywords. One of these was ‘used cars’. On clicking on the BMW link, the user wasn’t transferred to a page with high relevance to used cars, but was redirected to a completely different BMW page, with fewer references. This meant that readers were presented with a page less relevant to their search (according to the Google algorithm) than implied by its appearance in the search results.
As a result of this practice, BMW was removed from the Google index until they agreed to remove the offending pages and resubmit the website for evaluation. The potential revenue lost by being removed from Google can be enough motivation for many businesses to avoid any such tricks.
Pushing the Boundaries
Before a technique becomes black-hat, it has to become established as an effective technique and attract a negative response from the search engines. This means that the hugely powerful creative SEO solution of today may become the black-hat offence that carries a penalty tomorrow.
So how do you know whether the fantastic technique you’re using is not going to be penalised or restricted by Google in the future?
Matt Cutts is a Google Spam Engineer at Google and is tasked with identifying and assessing methods of misrepresenting websites – spamming - through the Google algorithm. Recently, he was interviewed at an SEO conference in the States and had this to say. (You can also view the original video.)
“I try not to think what’s right or wrong for Google. I think what’s right or wrong for users and then Google tries to align ourselves with what is right or wrong. The fact that people can already ask themselves what is really good for users and guess what stance Google’s going to take means you don’t really need me to tell them.”
Therefore, when deciding whether your brilliantly effective new trick is going to be supported or criticised by Google, you only need to consider how it affects the end-user experience. This is the point that causes the most controversy, as webmasters argue from their own biased perspectives on what is best for the end-user? When is using cookies to present different information to a potential customer providing a responsive service and when is it deceptive? With no clear arbiter of right and wrong on the web, with even Google’s guidelines arguably a biased and flawed viewpoint, there is enough grey in the middle of this to fuel arguments on all sides.
How Fair is the Race?
Some industries are far more competitive than others and are therefore more prone to black-hat tricks. For example, a Google search for ‘loans’ presents a number of websites that are suspected of using some questionable methods. For a website dealing in loans, it may be wiser to choose some less competitive keyword phrases with a higher chance of success. There are many black-hat websites that are entirely comfortable with the short term gains of their techniques, making money and merely closing down and starting up elsewhere, should the trick be blown. The best choice is probably finding the races where black-hats are less prevalent – the less competitive keywords or different approaches to garnering traffic through blogs and social media, for example.
The Risks – to You and the Industry
Seth Godin, a major and highly respected authority on marketing in all forms, recently discussed the topic of gaming the system in his blog. Optimising results within the rules may be less effective than exploiting loopholes, but loopholes get closed. Short term success may result in long term pain.
What may be a great idea today may cause great damage to your online business tomorrow. The trick used to catapult your website to the top of Google can shoot you straight back to the bottom if the algorithm changes. If your website relies on tricks and loopholes, you may find your website struggles to survive without them and the price of reclaiming your previous ranking may be costly and time-consuming.
Despite the risks, there are many that choose a black-hat path, often out of a belief that the internet should not be bound by rules and guidelines. They argue that Google’s Webmaster Guidelines are no more than a large corporation playing god with the livelihoods of small business.
Google’s success came about because everyone chose to run in their race. There are other races in town, other ways of attracting traffic, but Google was quickly established as the Olympic event in search. If a website doesn’t want to run in the Google race, then they needn’t worry about the Webmaster Guidelines and shouldn’t complain when they disappear from Google. But if the intention is to win the Google race, the rules are clear.
An athlete cannot insist on running at the Olympics only to shout that the Olympic committee is unfair to use their huge status to restrict drug use. Yet black-hats do argue with Google every day on the application of guidelines designed to protect the quality of its service.
Planet Domain offers SEO services completely within the Google Webmaster Guidelines. Entrusted with the livelihoods of hundreds of small businesses, we understand the importance of approaching SEO ethically and with the minimum of risk. You can read more about our search engine optimisation services on our website.

